{"id":2623,"date":"2017-07-11T11:28:41","date_gmt":"2017-07-11T11:28:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623"},"modified":"2017-07-11T11:28:41","modified_gmt":"2017-07-11T11:28:41","slug":"tribunal-supremo-estima-recurso-casacion-audiencia-huelva-anula-participaciones-preferentes-bankia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

El Tribunal Supremo<\/strong> estima recurso de casaci\u00f3n<\/strong> interpuesto por los letrados de ATO Abogados contra la Sentencia Audiencia Provincial Huelva,<\/strong>\u00a0Secci\u00f3n 2\u00aa<\/strong>, procediendo a declarar la nulidad<\/strong> de un\u00a0contrato de participaciones preferentes de Bankia<\/strong> por error vicio en el consentimiento, tal y como estim\u00f3 el Juzgado Primera Instancia N\u00ba2 Huelva.<\/h3>\n

Antecedentes<\/strong><\/p>\n

En febrero de 2010, nuestros clientes adquieren \u00abParticipaciones Preferentes Caja Madrid 2009\u00bb en una oficina de la entidad Caja Madrid (tras un proceso de fusi\u00f3n, Bankia). En mayo de 2013 Bankia procede al canje de las participaciones por acciones de la entidad, ocasionando unas importantes p\u00e9rdidas a los clientes por la cotizaci\u00f3n de dichas acciones.<\/p>\n

Tramitaci\u00f3n en primera instancia<\/strong>.- En septiembre de 2013, los letrados de nuestro bufete interponen demanda contra Caja Madrid, siendo estimada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia N\u00ba 2 de Huelva, que declara la nulidad<\/strong> del contrato de \u00abparticipaciones preferentes Caja Madrid 2009\u00bb y condenando a la entidad (ahora Bankia) al reintegro de la cantidad que resultara de la restituci\u00f3n rec\u00edproca de los pagos efectuados entre las partes derivados del contrato, m\u00e1s los intereses legales y moratorios.<\/p>\n

Tramitaci\u00f3n en segunda instancia<\/strong>.- Bankia interpuso recurso de apelaci\u00f3n ante Audiencia Provincial de Huelva, que en 2014 revoca la Sentencia del Juzgado y desestima por completo nuestra demanda.<\/p>\n

Interposici\u00f3n y tramitaci\u00f3n del recurso de casaci\u00f3n<\/strong>.- En 2015 se interpone dicho recurso ante el Tribunal Supremo, que admite a tr\u00e1mite, resolviendo en junio de 2017 y confirmando \u00edntegramente la Sentencia en primera instancia del Juzgado.<\/strong><\/p>\n

La propia Sentencia afirma, de manera incoherente con la relajaci\u00f3n con que exige el cumplimiento de los deberes de informaci\u00f3n<\/strong> por parte de la entidad, que la falta de cuidado en la asesor\u00eda, al ofrecer como rentable un producto propio se produjo \u00abcon informaci\u00f3n sobre la calidad de las participaciones desfasada (las clasificaciones de agencias de rating del folleto de emisi\u00f3n se datan con arreglo a la verdad pero son de fechas pasadas) o con previsiones de crecimiento o revalorizaci\u00f3n que carecieran de verdadero fundamento, y m\u00e1s cuando se trata de vender valores propios y siendo que deber\u00eda la entidad disponer de mejor informaci\u00f3n (el director de la sucursal que act\u00faa por el banco dio cuenta clara de haber dado consejos financieros en la m\u00e1s total ignorancia)\u00bb.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

El razonamiento de la Sentencia recurrida es contrario a la doctrina de la Sala<\/strong> puesto que, clasificados los clientes como minoristas por la propia entidad, es a esta a la que incumbe probar que la informaci\u00f3n sobre los riesgos del producto fue proporcionada con antelaci\u00f3n suficiente y que, no producida tal circunstancia, concurren en los actores circunstancias que permiten llegar al convencimiento de que s\u00ed pudieron representarse las caracter\u00edsticas del producto de forma suficiente como para prestar su consentimiento de manera libre y no viciada por error.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][wpc_custom_heading heading=\u00bbTAMBI\u00c9N LE PUEDE INTERESAR CONSULTAR \u00bb colored_line=\u00bbyes\u00bb position=\u00bbcenter\u00bb size=\u00bbmedium\u00bb][vc_masonry_grid post_type=\u00bbpost\u00bb max_items=\u00bb10″ style=\u00bbload-more\u00bb items_per_page=\u00bb6″ initial_loading_animation=\u00bbfadeIn\u00bb grid_id=\u00bbvc_gid:1499772841643-139cf16e-2716-7″ taxonomies=\u00bb71, 70″][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] El Tribunal Supremo estima recurso de casaci\u00f3n interpuesto por los letrados de ATO Abogados contra la Sentencia Audiencia Provincial […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2629,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,8,37],"tags":[11,114,20,21,38],"class_list":["post-2623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-despacho","category-derecho-bancario","category-participaciones-preferentes","tag-abogado","tag-bankia","tag-huelva","tag-nulidad","tag-participaciones-preferentes"],"yoast_head":"\nTribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia - Ato Abogados<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia Audiencia Provincial Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato de participaciones preferentes de Bankia.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia Audiencia Provincial Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato de participaciones preferentes de Bankia.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ato Abogados\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-07-11T11:28:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"910\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"632\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/339094c0ed8b34df7ecc820a243cf6e8\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-11T11:28:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623\"},\"wordCount\":565,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/07\\\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"abogado\",\"Bankia\",\"huelva\",\"nulidad\",\"participaciones preferentes\"],\"articleSection\":[\"ATO Abogados\",\"Derecho bancario\",\"participaciones preferentes\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623\",\"name\":\"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia - Ato Abogados\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/07\\\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-11T11:28:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/339094c0ed8b34df7ecc820a243cf6e8\"},\"description\":\"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia Audiencia Provincial Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato de participaciones preferentes de Bankia.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/07\\\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/07\\\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg\",\"width\":910,\"height\":632,\"caption\":\"TS participaciones preferentes bankia ato abogados\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?p=2623#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Portada\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ato Abogados\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/339094c0ed8b34df7ecc820a243cf6e8\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a15a1451b6fc812335528c68812e7f8755e59467fcfdbf350112539a6b50a203?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a15a1451b6fc812335528c68812e7f8755e59467fcfdbf350112539a6b50a203?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a15a1451b6fc812335528c68812e7f8755e59467fcfdbf350112539a6b50a203?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/staging.atoabogados.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia - Ato Abogados","description":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia Audiencia Provincial Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato de participaciones preferentes de Bankia.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia","og_description":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia Audiencia Provincial Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato de participaciones preferentes de Bankia.","og_url":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623","og_site_name":"Ato Abogados","article_published_time":"2017-07-11T11:28:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":910,"height":632,"url":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"admin","Tiempo de lectura":"3 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/#\/schema\/person\/339094c0ed8b34df7ecc820a243cf6e8"},"headline":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia","datePublished":"2017-07-11T11:28:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623"},"wordCount":565,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg","keywords":["abogado","Bankia","huelva","nulidad","participaciones preferentes"],"articleSection":["ATO Abogados","Derecho bancario","participaciones preferentes"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623","url":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623","name":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia - Ato Abogados","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg","datePublished":"2017-07-11T11:28:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/#\/schema\/person\/339094c0ed8b34df7ecc820a243cf6e8"},"description":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia Audiencia Provincial Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato de participaciones preferentes de Bankia.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/TS-participaciones-preferentes-bankia-2.jpg","width":910,"height":632,"caption":"TS participaciones preferentes bankia ato abogados"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?p=2623#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Portada","item":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal Supremo estima recurso casaci\u00f3n contra Sentencia AP Huelva Sec. 2\u00aa y anula contrato preferentes Bankia"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/","name":"Ato Abogados","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/#\/schema\/person\/339094c0ed8b34df7ecc820a243cf6e8","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a15a1451b6fc812335528c68812e7f8755e59467fcfdbf350112539a6b50a203?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a15a1451b6fc812335528c68812e7f8755e59467fcfdbf350112539a6b50a203?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a15a1451b6fc812335528c68812e7f8755e59467fcfdbf350112539a6b50a203?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com"],"url":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2623"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2623\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.atoabogados.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}